<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Safari blowhard switches to Firefox 3, film at 11</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brad-x.com/2008/08/02/safari-blowhard-switches-to-firefox-3-film-at-11/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brad-x.com/2008/08/02/safari-blowhard-switches-to-firefox-3-film-at-11</link>
	<description>Brad Laue's Blog</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 11:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Vitaliy</title>
		<link>http://www.brad-x.com/2008/08/02/safari-blowhard-switches-to-firefox-3-film-at-11#comment-10332</link>
		<dc:creator>Vitaliy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brad-x.com/?p=290#comment-10332</guid>
		<description>I believe one of the first paragraphs sums up my whole view...
"I liked Safari because it was a faster and more standards compliant browser, and it just felt more correct to use the native rendering engine included with the OS."
Safari remains a faster, more standard compliant, native Cocoa, and has excellent OS integration.

The problem with Mozilla Firefox users is that they are trying to make the browser into something that a browser is not, and should not be. It is not browsers job to be your media player, organizer, nor should it posses the ability to synchronize files across multiple computers and devices.

"In Finland, about half of web surfers use Firefox, so most local web sites work with it, which is not quite so with webkit-based browsers like Omniweb and Safari." by JuHa
One of the fundamental goals of the Mozilla project was to counter the lack of standards and interoperability that was created by Microsoft and Internet Explorer. If you do not see the hilarity in the comment above you are mentally retarded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe one of the first paragraphs sums up my whole view&#8230;<br />
&#8220;I liked Safari because it was a faster and more standards compliant browser, and it just felt more correct to use the native rendering engine included with the OS.&#8221;<br />
Safari remains a faster, more standard compliant, native Cocoa, and has excellent OS integration.</p>
<p>The problem with Mozilla Firefox users is that they are trying to make the browser into something that a browser is not, and should not be. It is not browsers job to be your media player, organizer, nor should it posses the ability to synchronize files across multiple computers and devices.</p>
<p>&#8220;In Finland, about half of web surfers use Firefox, so most local web sites work with it, which is not quite so with webkit-based browsers like Omniweb and Safari.&#8221; by JuHa<br />
One of the fundamental goals of the Mozilla project was to counter the lack of standards and interoperability that was created by Microsoft and Internet Explorer. If you do not see the hilarity in the comment above you are mentally retarded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brad</title>
		<link>http://www.brad-x.com/2008/08/02/safari-blowhard-switches-to-firefox-3-film-at-11#comment-10324</link>
		<dc:creator>brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brad-x.com/?p=290#comment-10324</guid>
		<description>monoclast: Good call. I'm still browsing through and finding the good ones. Suggestions are most welcome! I'll check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>monoclast: Good call. I&#8217;m still browsing through and finding the good ones. Suggestions are most welcome! I&#8217;ll check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoclast</title>
		<link>http://www.brad-x.com/2008/08/02/safari-blowhard-switches-to-firefox-3-film-at-11#comment-10323</link>
		<dc:creator>monoclast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brad-x.com/?p=290#comment-10323</guid>
		<description>I should also add that not only does ABP block ads, it also prevents your web browser from even *downloading* them, which means web browsing is even faster with ABP!  It's the best!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should also add that not only does ABP block ads, it also prevents your web browser from even *downloading* them, which means web browsing is even faster with ABP!  It&#8217;s the best!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoclast</title>
		<link>http://www.brad-x.com/2008/08/02/safari-blowhard-switches-to-firefox-3-film-at-11#comment-10322</link>
		<dc:creator>monoclast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 17:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brad-x.com/?p=290#comment-10322</guid>
		<description>I'm surprised you didn't mention AdBlock Plus!:

	http://adblockplus.org

ABP is one of the best ad blocking extensions available for *any* web browser, hands down. It's:

* free and open source
* subscription based (also free)
* very configurable
* 99.9% effective at blocking every singe ad from every single web page you visit

I am spoiled - I refuse to browse without ABP anymore. The fact that Safari doesn't let me use extensions like ABP and Foxmarks is what prevents me from seriously considering it as my default web browser. The Firefox / ABP / Foxmarks combination can't be beat!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you didn&#8217;t mention AdBlock Plus!:</p>
<p>	<a href="http://adblockplus.org" >http://adblockplus.org</a></p>
<p>ABP is one of the best ad blocking extensions available for *any* web browser, hands down. It&#8217;s:</p>
<p>* free and open source<br />
* subscription based (also free)<br />
* very configurable<br />
* 99.9% effective at blocking every singe ad from every single web page you visit</p>
<p>I am spoiled - I refuse to browse without ABP anymore. The fact that Safari doesn&#8217;t let me use extensions like ABP and Foxmarks is what prevents me from seriously considering it as my default web browser. The Firefox / ABP / Foxmarks combination can&#8217;t be beat!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JuHa</title>
		<link>http://www.brad-x.com/2008/08/02/safari-blowhard-switches-to-firefox-3-film-at-11#comment-10316</link>
		<dc:creator>JuHa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Aug 2008 08:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brad-x.com/?p=290#comment-10316</guid>
		<description>I had quite similar experiences in switching from Omniweb to Firefox. In Finland, about half of web surfers use Firefox, so most local web sites work with it, which is not quite so with webkit-based browsers like Omniweb and Safari. FoxMarks and 1Password made the transition to Firefox quite painless.

Here are three add-ons which I found useful: Adblock Plus (get rid of all ads), Fission (Safari-like progress bar) and Quartz PDF Plugin (view pdf-files in browser). I also like the "wiki auto-discovery button".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had quite similar experiences in switching from Omniweb to Firefox. In Finland, about half of web surfers use Firefox, so most local web sites work with it, which is not quite so with webkit-based browsers like Omniweb and Safari. FoxMarks and 1Password made the transition to Firefox quite painless.</p>
<p>Here are three add-ons which I found useful: Adblock Plus (get rid of all ads), Fission (Safari-like progress bar) and Quartz PDF Plugin (view pdf-files in browser). I also like the &#8220;wiki auto-discovery button&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
